|
Today, investors are
looking at a much hazier economic environment for the future than a year
ago. Market expectations govern investment activity in all financial
investments as capital chases risk-adjusted returns. A close look at the
psychology of risk, however, may allow real estate investors to use such
doubt to their advantage. In general terms, the risk is the uncertainty
that an investment will not earn its expected rate of return. The three
types of risk that a real estate investor faces are:
1. Overall market risk (i.e. national market risk of inflation, interest
rates, capital flows), which is considered unavoidable;
2. Property Sector risk (i.e. inherent risk differences among residential,
office, retail, industrial), which can be minimized;
3. Individual property risk (i.e. physical characteristics, location,
quality, leases in place) which is avoidable.
In efficient markets, investors are not rewarded for the latter two forms
of risk because, theoretically, they can be eliminated by diversifying
your portfolio. However, real estate markets are not as efficient as the
stock and bond market. Property markets are illiquid, trading is
infrequent, assets are not homogeneous (no two assets are similar by
location and type), transaction costs are high and information is
imperfect because there is no central exchange.
In today's economic environment, and given the inefficiencies in the real
estate market, an investor can identify opportunities at the individual
property risk level, and thereby outperform the market by doing superior
research. The market's ability to seize on real estate opportunities has
clearly shifted from the no-brainer investment phase of the early 1990s to
a very selective property level opportunity base. To be successful,
investors have to shift their focus to meticulous property cash flow and
price analyses. Identifying opportunities today, demands that investors be
rigorously grounded in understanding property sector risk analysis - that
is, they must be able to develop a credible cash flow forecast and to
complete an unbundling analysis of the components to measure the relative
risk of the asset. Investors also need to apply both fundamental and
technical analysis to the property sector risk. By understanding the
expected and required returns of a specific property, opportunities can be
predicted.
Overall Market Risk
Factors that determine the market risk are:
-
Demand Supply -
In a well-functioning market, the price of a property should bring
demand and supply into equilibrium. If a surge in demand pushes the
price of existing property above its replacement cost, developers have
an incentive to build more. But the new properties take years to
complete. By the time buildings are built, demand may have fallen, so
prices will slump. Worse still, because of the lags, supply will for a
period continue to increase even as prices decline, pushing them lower.
This lag between demand growth and supply response is a major cause of
volatility in real estate cycles. Understanding the demand supply
situation is a key to successful real estate investing.
-
Interest rates &
inflation - The level of interest rate and inflation rate determines the
state of activity in real estate market as it affects the cost of
borrowing and expectation of return. Further inflation has an impact on
property prices and level of rents.
-
Capital flows -
There is a new capital order of discipline in the real estate market.
Capital is rationally priced and allocated along the risk spectrum.
Investors must have a clear understanding of the relative discipline of
capital flows to the market. A determination has to be made if capital
is being rationally allocated (capital is chasing risk-adjusted returns)
or if it is being thrown at the investment (capital is chasing the
product). As we saw in the early boom of 1990s in real estate, and in
the late 1990s for the technology sector, if capital is chasing the
product, then the market is doomed for large corrections later on. But
for real estate today, capital is chasing risk-adjusted returns, which
means that investors should look at real estate as solid investment
opportunity compared to alternative investments.
-
Yields - have
decreased in past few years, mainly due to drop in interest rates.
Required total returns usually follow the trend of interest rates, as
investors and lenders are accepting a lower rate of return as deals
become positively leveraged.
Property Sector
Risk
With the various property types (office, residential, retail, industrial,
hotel); comes different property cycles. Economic dynamics directly affect
each of the property types differently. Real Estate is relatively slower
to respond to changes in the economy as compared to many other businesses.
Knowing the background of a market and property type within a market can
help to determine the risks and cycle length of a market.
Office sector
Office properties have been the underperforming sector due to technology
meltdown, a weaker business environment, closures, layoffs and mergers,
absence of fresh demand, emergence of multiple business districts. As a
result vacancy levels have risen resulting in falling rents and prices.
Further, this sector is still facing a supply overhang as new properties
started during the commercial boom of year 2000 and 2001 are now being
marketed.
The outlook for this sector looks promising with the economy gaining
momentum and prices of both rent and capital values looking reasonable
from historical and international standards.
Residential Sector
Lower interest rates, favourable taxation treatment on mortgage payments,
easy availability of finance has contributed to the success of this
sector. The average return has been more than 10% in residential sector
over last two to three years. This has led to a large development pipeline
with developers wishing to cash in the rising residential boom. The prices
in new projects continue to rise so does the gap between new and resale
properties.
Retail Sector
The emergence of organised retailing and entry of foreign retailers has
brought cheers to the retail sector. Retail sector continues to provide
positive returns.
Individual Property Risk Analysis
Property selection (tactical) decisions should take precedence over
strategic decisions (asset allocation and property sector) in today's
market. An improved understanding of markets and property economics can be
obtained through research, market analysis, and property-specific due
diligence. While obtaining information on individual properties (income
and expenses, conditions, location, quality of construction, title, etc)
requires work, it can be accomplished through a fairly simple and
straightforward process. The understanding obtained through this process
substantially reduces risk.
Conclusion
Real Estate is by far the world's biggest single asset class. Investors
have much more money tied up in property than in shares or bonds. Real
Estate is just as prone to irrational exuberance as is the stock market.
It should not be viewed as an easy way to make money. People buy property
in the expectation that its price will continue to rise strongly over
time. Such expectations lie at the core of all bubbles. Bubbles form when
the price of any asset gets out of line with its underlying value.
The price you pay for a property should reflect the future rent at which
you could let it. Just as in the stock market, the prices in real estate
are also driven by sentiments. All that is required to reverse a price
movement is a change in sentiment.
Real Estate also lends itself to research and market analysis that can
greatly increase an investor's understanding of the economic fundamentals
affecting a potential investment in a specific property. Research and
analysis, properly done, substantially reduces risk. This is essential to
successful real estate investments.
About the author:
Sorabh Jain is a Chartered Accountant and holds a Masters degree from
London Business School, UK. He is a Director of Mymakaan Limited. The
views expressed above are personal. He can be reached at
sorabh@mymakaan.com
This article
appeared in Times Personal on September 23, 2003. |